The following proposals passed:

---

Proposal 14: 3D.10.3 Mass Start

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 20, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 8, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 1.

Background

The mass start is the ideal type of start for a confrontational race (Most often organized with heat starts).
Today, there are very few mass starts organized.

The introduction of free distance road races in the 2019 IUF rulebook gives greater freedom in the choice of start (and finish) location, which should encourage the organization of mass starts.

Proposal

Old rule:

3D.10 Starting Configuration

Line-up order and heats must be assigned prior to the race. There are three allowable formats for designating the starting conguration of a Road Race: individual start (section 3D.10.1), heat start (section 3D.10.2), or mass start (section 3D.10.3).

To determine which start conguration to use, read the following rules from top to bottom. Once you have an outcome, disregard the remaining rules.
• If this is an Individual Time Trial format race, use individual start.
• If the course is too narrow to allow for racers to safely and fairly start in heats, use individual start.
• If you cannot safely start five or more riders across, use individual start.
• If the starting field consists of 30 riders or less, use a mass start.
• If the course does not allow for ten riders to ride abreast for at least 500 meters before the course narrows, use heats of 12 or more riders.
• If the starting field consists of more than 50 riders, use heats of 20 or more riders.
• In all other cases, use a mass start.

The various classes may share the race course, but Standard racers should always start separately from Unlimited racers, also in the case of mass starts. Unlimited racers should start first, unless there is no risk that Unlimited riders have to pass Standard riders (for example they race on dierent days).

In the sections below, fastest rider means fastest rider by seed time. Seed time is defined as an estimated finish time, preferably based on past performance in similar event(s). If no seed time is submitted by the rider or their coach, the organization can assign a seed time.

3D.10.3 Mass Start

A mass start is a start in which all racers of a certain class (such as Standard or Unlimited) start together. Males and Females of the same class start at the same time.

New rule:

3D.10 Starting Configuration

Line-up order and heats must be assigned prior to the race. There are three allowable formats for designating the starting conguration of a Road Race: individual start (section 3D.10.1), heat start (section 3D.10.2), or mass start (section 3D.10.3).

To determine which start conguration to use, read the following rules from top to bottom. Once you have an outcome, disregard the remaining rules.
• If this is an Individual Time Trial format race, use individual start.
• If the course is too narrow to allow for racers to safely and fairly start in heats, use individual start.
• If you cannot safely start five or more riders across, use individual start.
• If the starting field consists of 30 riders or less, use a mass start.
• If the course does not allow for ten riders to ride abreast for at least 500 meters before the course narrows, use heats of 12 or more riders.
• If the starting field consists of more than 100 riders, use heats of 20 or more riders.
• In all other cases, use a mass start.

Unlimited racers should start first, unless there is no risk that Unlimited riders have to pass Standard riders (for example they race on different days).

In the sections below, fastest rider means fastest rider by seed time. Seed time is defined as an estimated finish time, preferably based on past performance in similar event(s). If no seed time is submitted by the rider or their coach, the organization can assign a seed time.

3D.10.3 Mass Start

1. A mass start is a grouped start where all participants start the race together. This type of start is commonly used for long-distance races (marathon or longer free distance road races).
2. The organizer may choose to separate the starts based on class and gender, allowing for up to four separate starts, resulting in three possible configurations:
2.1. Standard and Unlimited start together, all genders combined (1 start) (not suitable for road races at UNICON),
2.2. Standard and Unlimited start separately, all genders combined (2 starts),
2.3. Standard and Unlimited start separately, with males and females also starting separately (4 starts).
3. In any case the starting order on the line may be determined based on seed times or other criteria set by the organizer.

Body

In this proposal :

• 3D.10 Starting Configuration: If the starting field consists of more than 100 riders (instead of 50 riders), use heats of 20 or more riders .
• 3D.10.2 Mass start (and the different starting options). Option 1: Standard and unlimited riders can start at the same time in a mass start (but not at UNICON); Option 3: the most realistic option for an event with many competitors, and was not described in the old rule.

References

---

Proposal 9: 3B.3 Rider Identification - change the rule

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 19, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

11 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 1.

Background

The numbers placed on the chest are often not visible to referees, not usable for foto finish and are annoying for the racers.

Proposal

OLD RULE

3B.3 Rider Identification

Riders must wear their race number(s) fixed at the four corners, clearly visible on their
chest and, when required, on their back so that it is visible during the race and as the rider
crosses the finish line. Riders must use the officially provided race number unmodified
in any manner. Numbers should not be folded, trimmed, or otherwise defaced. Referee
approval must be sought to modify a number plate if it cannot otherwise be attached
securely due to hydration pack, rider physique or posture when riding. Lost or damaged
race numbers must be replaced with approval by referee. Additionally, riders may be
required to wear a chip for electronic timing.

 

NEW RULE

3B.3 Rider Identification

3B.3.1 Race Numbers

Riders must wear their race number in accordance with the organizer's instructions so that it is clearly visible during the race and when crossing the finish line. The recommended position for the start number is on the back. Organizers may provide special race numbers for the helmet, arms or hips, so that the riders can be identified from the side during the race.

Riders must use the officially provided race number unmodified in any manner. Numbers should not be folded, trimmed, or otherwise defaced. Referee
approval must be sought to modify a race number if it cannot otherwise be attached securely due to hydration pack, rider physique or posture when riding. Lost or damaged race numbers must be replaced with approval by referee.

3B.3.2 Chips for Electronic Timing

Riders may be required to wear an electronic timing chip, as specified by the timing personnel. This chip may be attached, among other methods, as a disposable tag to the race number, which may have to be worn on the chest.

Body

The proposed rule require from riders to wear race number as required by the organizer. 
Organizer has provided recommendation to use the number on the back and freedom to choose other methods of marking the rider including chips for timing.

References

---

Proposal 26: Minor typo in Section 15B.2, and an occasion to practice proposals and voting

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 29, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

There is a missing point at the end of Section 15B.2.

Proposal

Section 15B.2

Add a point at the end of the sentence `The tire must not leave marks on the floor`.

Body

Typo

References

---

Proposal 11: Revise 3B.4 Protests

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 20, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 7, Disagree: 1, Abstain: 1.

Background

The current rule is problematic if the results of a race are published many hours later and participants may not even be aware of the publication - this is a particular problem at large events such as Unicon.
The proposal addresses this problem on the one hand by differentiating between bigger and smaller events and on the other hand by differentiating between the time after the end of the race in which the results are published. This leaves the option of working with a shorter protest period for races such as the Criterium, as the results are usually published quite fast here.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3B.4 Protests

Protests must be filed on an official form within two hours of the posting of event results.
Every effort will be made for all protests to be handled within 30 minutes from the time they are received.

 

New Rule:

3B.4 Protests

1. Protests must be filed on an official form. Mistakes in paperwork, inaccuracies in placing, and interference from other riders or other sources are all grounds for protests. All Referee decisions are final, and cannot be protested.
2. The default protest time (counting from the posting of results) depends on the type of event and the time after the competition within the results are published. The default protest time can be extended or shortend up to the minimum by the Race Director. Every deviation from the default protest time has to be clearly announced when the results are posted, including stating the protest deadline on the results list itself. The protest time may be extended for riders who have to be in other races during the protest period.
2.1 For a large event such as Unicon or continental championships, for all results published within 90 minutes after the end of the competiotion, the default protest time is 120 minutes, the minimum is 30 minutes. For results published more than 90 minutes after the end of the competition but before 8 p.m. of the same day, the minimum protest time is 120 minutes. For all results published after 8 p.m. on the same day or on another day, the protest deadline is 12 p.m. (noon time) on the day after publication.
2.2 For smaller events, for all results published within 90 minutes after the end of the competition, the default protest time is 60 minutes, the minimum is 15 minutes. For results published more than 90 minutes after the end of the competition, the minimum protest time is 60 minutes.
3. All protests will be acknowledged within 30 minutes from the time they are received, and an effort will be made to settle the issue within those 30 minutes.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 15: 14B.9.5 Penalty Box - Addition of time stop directive

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 20, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

11 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 1.

Background

Provide guidance on stopping timer for two minute send offs

Proposal

Old Rule

14B.9.5 Penalty Box

The referee can send a player off the field for two minutes, five minutes or for the re-mainder of the game. When a player is sent off for the remainder of the game they may not take part in the current match or their teams following match. However, after a five minute period the penalised team may bring a player on. These penalties are given in the case of unsporting behavior and also for intentional or dangerous disregard of the rules. While a player is in the penalty box, the team may not substitute a replacement for that player. The referees should consider the following guidelines when punishing a player. The timer should be stopped while referees discuss the appropriate punishment and explain their ruling to players:

 

New Rule

14B.9.5 Player Send-off

The referee can send a player off the field for two minutes, five minutes or for the remainder of the game. When a player is sent off for the remainder of the game they may not take part in the current match or their teams following match. However, after a five minute period the penalised team may bring a player on. These penalties are given in the case of unsporting behavior and also for intentional or dangerous disregard of the rules. While a player is in the penalty box, the team may not substitute a replacement for that player. Penalized players are prohibited from communicating with their team for the duration of the penalty. When enforcing a penalty, the referee should signal to stop the timer to discuss the required punishment, provide a precise start time for the penalty, and to explain their ruling to players. The referees should consider the following guidelines when punishing a player:

Addition of 

14D.6 Penalty Box

Designated seating for the penalty box must be provided on each half of the field, arranged so that players who are sent off remain separated from their teammates and the opposing team throughout the send-off period.

 

14C.2.4

14C.2.4 The Timer
The Timer checks the time of play with a stopwatch and/or with a score board. The time
is started whenever the referee starts the game by blowing the whistle. Each period is
ended by the sound of the score board (e.g. horn, bell, gong) or the blowing of a whistle
by the timer. The Timer also stops the time whenever the referee requests a stoppage of
time. In the case of a send-off, the timer records the time of send-off and the time the
offender or substitute player will be allowed back on to the field.

 

New rule

14C.2.4 The Timer
The Timer checks the time of play with a stopwatch and/or with a score board. The time
is started whenever the referee starts the game by blowing the whistle. Each period is
ended by the sound of the score board (e.g. horn, bell, gong) or the blowing of a whistle
by the timer. The Timer also stops the time whenever the referee requests a stoppage of
time. In the case of a send-off, the timer records the time of send-off and the time the
offender or substitute player will be allowed back on to the field. The timer must also notify the sent-off player when they are allowed to rejoin the match.

 

Body

Addition of the wording that outlines play should be stopped to provide a precise start time

 

Addition that the timer must notify the player when they may rejoin.

References

---

Proposal 34: Requiring judges to write down scores in battles

Committee: 9. Flatland

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

6 out of 10 voting members have voted.

Agree: 6, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Writing down battle scores is already best practice at most flatland competitions - let's change it in the rulebook. 

Proposal

Old rule: 

"9C.4.3 Battle Scoring
For battles, judges must decide on a single rider to vote on, they cannot tie the riders.
Judges are not required to write down scores for each category during battles. Judges
must determine a winner individually. The Chief Judge collects the results from each
judge and the winner is chosen by simple majority. The winner of each battle is then
announced directly."

 

New rule:

"9C.4.3 Battle Scoring
For battles, judges must decide on a single rider to vote on, they cannot tie the riders.
Judges are required to write down scores for each category during battles. Judges
must determine a winner individually. The Chief Judge collects the results from each
judge and the winner is chosen by simple majority. The winner of each battle is then
announced directly."

 

Body

The most objective decision on who wins a battle is made if it is ensured that judges keep on judging according to the official judging criteria - even in battles. If scores are not written down, judges may weight certain criteria more or less than in the official rules.

References

---

Proposal 41: Move 3D.7 Criterium to Section 3B.2 and Update Rule

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

8 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 7, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 1.

Background

This proposal merges the current Rule 3B.6 with Rule 3D.7, so that a clear description of the discipline is created and this information, which is also relevant for riders, can be found in full in Section 3B.2 in future.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3B.6 Criterium
A Criterium race is a short road race with distances of 5k to 10k. Courses should have left and right turns and multiple laps.

3D.7 Criterium
Criterium can be held around city block(s) or within a large parking lot. The recommended lap length is 500 to 1000 meters. It is recommend that the course has left and right turns, with consideration given to the safety and number of riders in the race. The race can be run as a set distance race (all riders will complete the same number of laps), or based upon time. A set distance race is strongly recommended for larger events. Different categories (e.g. Unlimited and Standard 24 Class) can have different race lengths. The starts are a mass start. If a rider falls due to other riders falling ahead or nearby, this is generally considered part of the race. Intentional interference with other riders is not permitted and may result in disqualification by the Referee.

3D.7.1 Set Distance Length
If the race is run as a set distance event, the number of laps should be announced clearly to riders before the start of the race. There should be three to ten laps. Each rider is responsible for counting their laps; organizers are not responsible for disqualified riders who do not complete the required number of laps.

3D.7.2 Time-based Length
The Criterium can also be run as a time-based event. Using the time from the top rider's first two laps, the referee will determine how many laps could be completed in the desired time limit. From this point on, the number of remaining laps (for the leaders) will be displayed and this will be used to determine when finish of the race occurs. A bell will be rung with one lap to go. Lapped riders in the race will all finish on the same lap as the leader and will be placed according to the number of laps they are down and then their position at the finish.

 

New Rule:

3B.2.3 Criterium

1. A Criterium is a short drafting race with distances of about 5 km to 10 km. It can be held around city block(s) or within a large parking lot. The courses should have left and right turns and multiple laps with a recommended lap length of 500 m to 1000 m.
2. A Criterium can be run in one of the following two variants:
2.1 As a set distance criterium, where all riders will complete the same number of laps.
2.2 As a time-based criterium, in which all riders ride one more lap after a set time and then everyone finishes the race.

3B.2.3.1 Set Distance Criterium

1. The number of laps should be three to ten laps and must be announced clearly to riders before the start of the race.
2. Each rider is responsible for counting their laps; organizers are not responsible for riders who do not finish the race due to not completing the required number of laps.

3B.2.3.1 Time-Based Criterium

1. Using the time from the top rider's first two laps, the referee will determine how many laps could be completed in the desired time limit. From this point on, the number of remaining laps (for the leaders) will be displayed and this will be used to determine when finish of the race occurs. A bell will be rung with one lap to go.
2. Lapped riders in the race will all finish on the same lap as the leader and will be placed according to the number of laps they are down and then their position at the finish.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 25: 8C.3 Judging Table (Amendment)

Committee: 8. X-Style

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 25, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

6 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 6, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

I propose that we add a sentence(s) to the end of 8C.3 in the rulebook to require an odd number of pair judges/individual judges to lower the chances of ties being an issue in competition.

Proposal

8C.3

There must be an odd number of pair judges, or an odd number of judges if individuals are judging alone, on the judging table. 

Body

We ran into the issue of many ties during Unicon, particularly when the completion was down to only 2 riders. To lessen the chance of ties, there should be an odd amount of judges. 

References

See original discussion. 

---

Proposal 12: 14D.3.3 Markings

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 04, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

11 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 11, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

To make the distinction between the goal area and the rest of the playing field clearer, the 6.5m line shall be marked at the side walls.

Proposal

[...]The 6.5m lines are parallel to the goal lines and run through the 6.5m marks. The 6.5m lines shall be vertically marked on the barriers or walls of the playing field. The goal areas are between the 6.5m lines and the ends of the field.

Body

See discussion.

References

See also discussion here: https://iuf-rulebook-2022.committees.unicycling-software.com/discussions/71

---

Proposal 16: Captain identification

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 04, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

11 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 1, Abstain: 1.

Background

Adding captain rule

Proposal

OLD

14B.2 Rider Identification
All players of a team must wear shirts of the same color. The color must be clearly
different from the opponent's color. At tournaments and other large events each team
should have two different colored sets of shirts.

 

NEW

14B.2 Rider Identification
All players of a team must wear shirts of the same color. The color must be clearly
different from the opponent's color. At tournaments and other large events each team
should have two different colored sets of shirts. One Captain shall be appointed by each team, and they alone shall be authorized to consult with the referees regarding any queries on rule interpretation. Change of the team captain shall only take place in case of injury, illness or penalty box for the remainder of the game. The team captain shall wear an armband, which shall be worn on the upper arm and be clearly visible.

Body

As above

References

---

Proposal 18: Adding another judge/official - 3C.1.5 Course Judge

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 12, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

8 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 7, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 1.

Background

In the discussion about the revision of rule 3C.1.2 Referee, it was noted that the use of the term judge could cause confusion, as there are normally no judges in road races, only course marshals. It is correct that neither one nor the other is currently defined in the rules. Since judges are the people along the course who supervise compliance with the rules and, if necessary, direct the riders in the right way, we should add a Jude for the road races.

Proposal

Old rule:

None

 

New Rule:

3C.1.5 Course Judge

1. The Course Judge observes the adherence to the corresponding competition rules during the race. Sufficient number of Course Judges are to be appointed according to the discipline to guarantee an adequate supervision of the adherence to the rules.
2. The Course Judge can be assigned the task of securing the race course and directing the riders to the correct way.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion and in the discussion "Revise 3C.1.2 Referee"

References

---

Proposal 17: Revise 3C.1.1 Race Director

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 12, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

8 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 8, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

In the discussion about the revision of rule 3C.1.3 Starter, it was discussed to what extent the starter should explain the rules - the conclusion in the end was that a "race briefing" should not be the task of the starter, but of someone else, e.g. at the line-up or even before. Therfore it makes sense that the Race Director is responsible for ensuring that a “race briefing” happens.
Paragraph 4 has been added and deals with the race briefing. The remaining paragraphs have been taken from the current rule and have been slightly reordered.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3C.1.1 Race Director

The Race Director is the head organizer and administrator of road race events. With the Convention Host, the Race Director determines the course, obtains permits, interfaces with the community, and determines the system used to run the event. The Race Director is responsible for the logistics, equipment for all road racing events. With the Referee, the Race Director is in charge of keeping events running on schedule, and answers all questions not pertaining to rules and judging. The Race Director is the highest authority on everything to do with the road race events, except for decisions on rules and results.

 

New Rule:

3C.1.1 Race Director

1. The Race Director is the head organizer and administrator of road race events. The Race Director is the highest authority on everything to do with the road race events, except for decisions on rules and results. With the Convention Host, the Race Director determines the course, obtains permits, interfaces with the community, and determines the system used to run the event.
2. The Race Director is responsible for the logistics, equipment for all road racing events.
3. With the Referee, the Race Director is in charge of keeping events running on schedule, and answers all questions not pertaining to rules and judging.
4. The Race Director is responsible for ensuring that a race briefing is held with the riders before each race, in which course-specific aspects, in particular safety aspects, are explained.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion and in the discussion "Revise 3C.1.3 Starter"

References

---

Proposal 35: Change to overnight protest period timing

Committee: Main Committee

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 19 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

To help with predictability for competitors when results are not immediately available, I'm proposing an amendment for results posted after 8pm to have their protest period end at noon the following day. 

Proposal

Previous version:

1C.10

Protests An offcial protest/correction form must be available to riders at all times. All protests against any results must be submitted in writing on the proper form within two hours after the results are posted, unless there is a shorter time specified for certain events (for example: track racing). The form must befilled in completely. This time may be extended for riders who have to be in other races/events during that time period. Every effort will be made for all protests to be handled within 30 minutes from the time they are received. Mistakes in paperwork and interference from other riders or other sources are all grounds for protests. Protests handed in after awards have been delivered will not be considered if the results have been posted for at least three hours before the awards. If awards are delivered before results are posted, it is recommended to announce the schedule of posting and the deadline for protests at the awarding ceremonies. All Chief Judge or Referee decisions are final, and cannot be protested.

[...]

 

Proposed Amendment

1C.10 Protests

1. An official protest form must be available to riders at all times. All protests against any results must be submitted in writing on the proper form. The form must befilled in completely. Mistakes in paperwork, inaccuracies in placing, and interference from other riders or other sources are all grounds for protests. All Chief Judge or Referee decisions are final, and cannot be protested.
2. The default protest time (counting from the posting of results) is 120 minutes, unless there is a shorter time specified for certain events (for example: track racing). By default for all results published after 8 p.m. on the same day or on another day, the protest deadline is 12 p.m. (noon time) on the day after publication, unless something different is specified for certain events. Every deviation from the default protest time has to be clearly announced when the results are posted, including stating the protest deadline on the results list itself. The protest time may be extended for riders who have to be in other races/events during the protest period.
3. All protests will be acknowledged within 30 minutes from the time they are received, and an effort will be made to settle the issue within those 30 minutes.
4. Protests handed in after awards have been delivered will not be considered if the results have been posted for at least three hours before the awards. If awards are delivered before results are posted, it is recommended to announce the schedule of posting and the deadline for protests at the awarding ceremonies. 

 

Body

Hopefully this is useful for schedulers, directors, and competitors to make the result flow more predictable. We adopted similar language in the Road racing committee, but I believe it to be more useful universally applied. The specific times probably have room for discussion if other times would be better for event flow. The goal is to allow a time in the evening where people may post results such that someone having breakfast the next day could review and file a protest if necessary. 

References

---

Proposal 29: 8C.3 Judging Table Amendment

Committee: 8. X-Style

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 25, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

6 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 6, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Judging in pairs is usually prefered as X-style offers a big variety off skills and two judges from different backrounds can often have a greater knowledge of a variety of tricks. Often this is nullified because riders often choose a judging partern from a similiar backround which they already know. Judging pairs would have a greater variety of backrounds if it was recommended that the chief judge suggest pairing judges of different riding styles/backgrounds.

Proposal

Old Rule:

8C.3 Judging Table

The Chief Judge composes the Judging Table for each starting group. All judges can be active competitors or non-competitors. Preferred are people with judging experience and competitors. Non-Competitors can apply for being a judge by contacting the Chief Judge in advance. The Chief Judge sets the application deadline. It is recommended that every starting group is judged by two other starting groups. The judging table consists of at least 5 Judges.
[...]

 

New Rule:

8C.3 Judging Table

The Chief Judge composes the Judging Table for each starting group. All judges can be active competitors or non-competitors. Preferred are people with judging experience and competitors. It is also preferred that the Chief judge attempt to pair riders of different backgrounds (ex: Flatland, Street, Freestyle) to foster more accurate judging of skills. Non-Competitors can apply for being a judge by contacting the Chief Judge in advance. The Chief Judge sets the application deadline. It is recommended that every starting group is judged by two other starting groups. The judging table consists of at least 5 Judges.
[...]

Body

As Ben pointed out, when freestyle riders pair judge with flatland riders, and flatland riders pair with freestyle riders, the judging will likely not be as fair; judging the difficulty of a flatland trick compared to a freestyle trick would be simpler if a flatland rider were to be paired with a freestyle rider. Since this might be simper in reason than in practice, especially since it is unknown how many freestyle/flat riders will be present in competition, I recommend it be added as a recommendation to the language of the rulebook rather than a requirement.

References

See discussion.

---

Proposal 19: 14B.2 Rider identification

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

11 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 2.

Background

Proposal

Body

Currently, the rules do not require that players wear any numbers. Numbered shirts are crucial for player identification, especially during penalty situations or when referees need to distinguish between players.

References

---

Proposal 31: Section 15A.1; FIBA documents URL update

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Update of the FIBA link (from http to https).

Proposal

Section 15A.1

The link to the page hosting the FIBA rules:
http://www.fiba.basketball/documents
should be updated in:
https://www.fiba.basketball/documents

Body

Better to use https than http.

References

---

Proposal 22: 6.5 m Penalty Execution distances

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Agreed that goalkeepers need more room than the current 0.5 m rule allows. In practice, 0.5 m is not adhered to anyway.

 

Additionally, we now specify that opposing players must remain at least 2.0 m away from the ball to ensure the shooter has a clear area to execute the 6.5 m shot.

Proposal

14B.9.2 6.5 M
...

The ball is placed at the 6.5 m mark. A player of the defending team goes to the goal
and must sit with the bottom of the wheel of their unicycle within 0.5 m of the goal line.
The other team chooses a player to shoot the 6.5 m. All other players must leave the
goal area. After the referee's whistle the goalkeeper must ride the unicycle freely and
not rest on the goal. The 6.5 m is direct. The player executing the 6.5 m may only touch
the ball once. The ball shall be hit with the stick, not dragged, flicked or lifted on the
stick. If no goal is scored, play continues as soon as the ball touches the post, the keeper
touches the ball or the ball crosses the extended goal line. A 6.5 m awarded at the end
of, or after a time period has ended, is still executed but play does not continue after an
unsuccessful shot.

 

 

New

14B.9.2 6.5 M
...

The ball is placed at the 6.5 m mark. A player of the defending team goes to the goal
and must sit with the bottom of the wheel of their unicycle within 1 m of the goal line.
The other team chooses a player to shoot the 6.5 m. All other players must leave the
goal area. Opposing players must keep a distance with their unicycles and their sticks of at least 2.0 m from the ball. 

After the referee's whistle the goalkeeper must ride the unicycle freely and
not rest on the goal. The 6.5 m is direct. The player executing the 6.5 m may only touch
the ball once. The ball shall be hit with the stick, not dragged, flicked or lifted on the
stick. If no goal is scored, play continues as soon as the ball touches the post, the keeper
touches the ball or the ball crosses the extended goal line. A 6.5 m awarded at the end
of, or after a time period has ended, is still executed but play does not continue after an
unsuccessful shot.

Body

Added in distances for keeper and opposition players

References

---

Proposal 21: Reorganisation of equipment section

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Proposal

Old:

14B.1 Unicycles

[...]

14B.2 Rider Identification

[...]

14B.3 Sticks

[...]

14B.6 Safety

[...]

14B.1 Equipment

14B.1.1 Unicycles

[...]

14B.1.2 Rider Identification

[...]

14B.1.3 Sticks

[...]

14B.1.4 Safety

[...]

Body

Reorganisation of the rules to combine all equipment-related rules in one section 14B.1 Equipment. No change of the individual rules (in this proposal).

References

---

Proposal 1: Revise 3C.1.2 Referee

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

The rule 3C.1.2 describes basically the tasks of the referee, but some points should be formulated a bit more detailed and one aspect is missing, which is very important, namely that the referee is the one, who disqualifies riders. The revision of rule 3C.1.2 addresses this aspects.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3C.1.2 Referee

The Referee is the head racing official, whose primary job is to make sure the competitors follow the rules. The Referee makes all final decisions regarding rule infractions. The Referee is responsible for resolving protests. The Referee must above all be objective and favor neither local, nor outside riders.

 

 

New Rule:

3C.1.2 Referee

1. The referee is the head racing official. The referee is responsible for making sure that the competition rules are observed and for deciding on all related questions that arise during the event. This applies in particular to the handling of protests, as well as to questions of interpretation of the rules.
2. The referee has full control and authority over all judges and must instruct them on all details and regulations related to the competition.
3. The referee must ensure that all necessary judges are on their assigned places. The referee may replace absent, incapacitated or inadequate judges with others and may appoint additional judges. The referee shall ensure that the judges do not interfere in the competition in a biased manner.
4. The referee can ban persons from the competition venue for the duration of the competition, if they significantly disturb the execution of the competition.
5. The referee has the exclusive right to disqualify riders in case of violations of the competition rules, with the exception of violations concerning the start. Violations of the competition rules can be determined by their own observations or in reports of the responsible judges. Violations of the competition rules have to be reported to the referee with the following information: Position and name of the judge, competition, start number of the rider, as well as a clear description of the violation.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 2: Adding another official - 3C.1.4 Timekeeper

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Currently there is no official for timekeeping in the rulebook, but since this position is always needed in any race, we should add it to the rulebook.

Proposal

Proposal for the new rule:

3C.1.4 Timekeeper

1. The Timekeeper must be responsible for the conformity to the rules and the functioning of the timing system.
2. The Timekeeper supervises the timing system and if a fully automatic timing and photo finish system is used, makes sure that the camera is correctly aligned.
3. The Timekeeper (in conjunction with an adequate number of assistants) must determine the official times of the riders. The timekeeper must ensure that these results are correctly entered in or transferred to the competition results system.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 3: Revise 3C.1.3 Starter

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 1, Abstain: 0.

Background

Currently, the rules for the starter specify the task of explaining race rules, but this should not be a general task of the starter to explain the rules because it has the potential to hold off the procedure at a competition and it should be the responsibility of some volunteers at the line-up and the competitor should also inform himself about the rules before the race starts.

Currently, some additional starter responsibilities can be found in section 3D.11 Starter Responsibilities. This does not contribute to the clarity of the rules and these rules should therefore be integrated into section 3C.1.3 (paragraph 2).

A new paragraph (paragraph 4) has been added for another important aspect: Ensure that the starter also has all riders in view.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3C.1.3 Starter

The starter starts races, explains race rules, and calls riders back in the event of false starts. The starter is in charge of checking riders for correct unicycles and safety equipment.

3D.11 Starter Responsibilities

If a verbal (spoken) count is used, there should be about 3/4 second between each element in the count, with the same amount of time between each of them. Starters should practice this before the races begin. Timing of the count is very important for an accurate start. This count can be in the local language, or a language agreed upon before competition starts.

 

New Rule:

3C.1.3 Starter

1. The Starter starts races and calls riders back in the event of false starts. The Responsibilities follow from the text in 3B.5.2, Starting and 3B.5.3, False Starts.
2. If a verbal (spoken) count is used, the time between (the start of) each of these elements must be the same, and should be approximately 1 second. Starters should practice this before the races begin. Timing of the count is very important for an accurate start. This count is to be given in English at Unicon or international competitions. At other competitions, English is optional.
3. The Starter checks riders for correct unicycles and safety equipment and will remove from the starting line-up any riders not properly equipped to race, including riders with dangerously loose shoelaces.
4. The starter has to take a position for the start from which he has an unobstructed view of the riders and the start command and signal can be easily perceived by the riders.

3D.11 Starter Responsibilities

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 4: Restructure Section 3B

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

10 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 10, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

For a better readability of the rules, I would divide the section into three large subsections: General Rules, which can be seen as a framework (3B.1 General Road Racing Rules), a subsection where the official disciplines are presented (3B.2 Road Racing Disciplines) and a section where the rules of a actual race are presented (3B.3 Racing Rules).

The current rules 3B.1 Safety, 3B.2 Unicycles, 3B.3 Rider Identication, 3B.4 Protests and 3B.5.1 Riders Must Be Ready are the rules that would be described as framework conditions. They do not necessarily relate to the specific race, but rather provide a framework within which races will take place.

The rurrent rule 3B.6 Criterium is already a short rule about presenting a discipline. There is currently nothing comparable for the other disciplines. These rules would have to be developed in separate proposals.

Basically a race can be divided into three parts: The start, the "actual race" and the finish. It would make sense to include this structure in the rules and have a subsection 3B.3 Racing Rules.
False starts (3B.3.1.1 False Start) are somehow part of the start and therefore could be included as a subsubchapter to the subchapter 3B.3.1 The Start. The rules 3B.5.4 Passing, 3B.5.5 Dismounts, 3B.5.6 Illegal Riding and 3B.5.7 Repair, Change, or Replace a (Broken) Unicycle belong to the rules of the actual race. This rules would become subsubchapters of the subchapter 3B.3.2 The Race.
For the finish there is rule 3B.5.8 Finishes, which would become the subchapter 3B.3.3 The Finish.
With this structure, it would be very clear to the riders which rules apply during the race and they would be sensibly and logically organized.

Proposal

3B.1 General Road Racing Rules
    3B.1.1 Safety
    3B.1.2 Unicycles
    3B.1.3 Rider Identification
    3B.1.4 Riders Must Be Ready
    3B.1.5 Protests
3B.2 Road Racing Disciplines
    3B.2.1 Fixed Distance Races
        3B.2.1.1 10 km
        3B.2.1.2 Marathon
        3B.2.1.3 100 km
    3B.2.2 Free Distance Races
    3B.2.3 Criterium
    3B.2.4 Time Trials
3B.3 Racing Rules
    3B.3.1 The Start
        3B.3.1.1 False Start
    3B.3.2 The Race
        3B.3.2.1 Illegal Riding
        3B.3.2.2 Passing
        3B.3.2.3 Dismounts
        3B.3.2.4 Repair, Change, or Replace a (Broken) Unicycle
    3B.3.3 The Finish

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

---

Proposal 7: 4B.2 Unicycles - Revise

Committee: 4 & 5. Muni

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Current rule does not include Freewheel.
Intention is to not make any restriction to the unicycles used in Muni

Proposal

Old Rule:

4B.2 Unicycles
There are no restrictions on wheel size, crank arm length, brakes, or gearing.

New Rule:

4B.2 Unicycles
Any unicycle may be used (as defined in Article 1D.1).

Body

Discussion on changing the Definition of Unicycle should be directed to Main Committee. (Removal of this sentence: It is driven by pedals and cranks which rotate to power the wheel.")

References

1D.1 Definitions
...
Unicycle: A Unicycle is a vehicle that has a single rolling contact with the riding
surface. It may have multiple wheels, but it must not be possible to ride the unicycle
when more than one wheel touches the ground. It is driven by pedals and cranks which
rotate to power the wheel. It is powered, balanced and controlled by the rider only, with
no additional support devices. Unless noted otherwise, a unicycle may be fitted with
handlebars and/or brake(s).

---

Proposal 8: 4B.1 Safety - Revise

Committee: 4 & 5. Muni

Vote Summary:

Passed on March 15, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Current rule mentions wrist guards - which are already included in the definition of gloves. 
Adding recommendation for back protector and full-fingered gloves for Downhill.

Proposal

Old Rule

4B.1 Safety
For all muni events, riders must wear shoes, knee pads, gloves/wrist-guards and helmets (see definitions in chapter 1D.1). Additional equipment such as shin, elbow or ankle protection are optional. 
Water and food are the responsibility of the rider. Hosts may offer food and water stations at their discretion.

New Rule

4B.1 Safety
For all muni events, riders must wear shoes, knee pads, gloves and helmets (see definitions in chapter 1D.1). Additional equipment such as shin, elbow or ankle protection are optional. Back protector or backpack and full-fingered gloves are recommended for Downhill.
Water and food are the responsibility of the rider. Hosts may offer food and water stations at their discretion.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

1D.1 Definitions
...
Gloves: (For racing) Any glove with thick material covering the palms (Leather is acceptable,
thin nylon is not). Gloves may be fingerless, such as bicycling gloves, provided
the palm of the hand is completely covered. Wrist guards, such as those used with in-line
skates, are an acceptable alternative to gloves.

---

Proposal 13: Distances

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

We have a distance of 1m from the wall/goal where a free shot is taken. This distance is too small such that the player executing the free short can move around freely and position her/himself towards the ball as she/he likes.

Proposal

14B.5.7 Ball Out Of Bounds

Old: [...] The free shot is done 1.0 m in from the side line.

New: [...] The free shot is done 2 m in from the side line.

14B.9 Penalties

Old: [...] In the event that an advantage was not gained, the referee should enforce the appropriate penalty from the initial point of infringement or, when the penalty has occurred within the goal area, the closest corner mark or 1 m in front of goal line. [...]

New: [...] In the event that an advantage was not gained, the referee should enforce the appropriate penalty from the initial point of infringement or, when the penalty has occurred within the goal area, the closest corner mark or 2 m in front of goal line. In cases where an infringement occurs outside the goal area and within 2 m of the sideline, the free shot shall be given from a spot located 2 m from the sideline.[...]

14B.9.1 Free Shot

Old: [...] If a team receives a free shot within their own goal area, the free shot is taken at a distance of 1 m in front of the goal line (goalkeeper's ball). [...]

New: [...] If a team receives a free shot within their own goal area, the free shot is taken at a distance of 2 m in front of the goal line (goalkeeper's ball). [...]

14D.3.3 Markings

Body

We have a distance of 1m from the wall/goal where a free shot is taken. This distance is too small such that the player executing the free short can move around freely and position her/himself towards the ball as she/he likes.

References

---

Proposal 20: 6.5m rebound clarification

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Proposal

Body

Clarification whether the shooting player of a 6.5m may score via a direct rebound (without any other player or their equipment touching the ball).

References

---

Proposal 23: 14.B.9.4 Face-off: Height of ball drop

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

8 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 8, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

The current rule mandates that the ball be dropped from "below hip height,".
This is ambiguous and inconsistent and too high.

A fixed height of 50 cm is preferable.

This height minimises bouncing and a 20 inch wheel with tyre is ~50cm making it easy for referees 

Proposal

OLD
14B.9.4 Face-off 
To resume the game without penalizing one of the teams, a face-off can be used. For 
the face-off, the referee drops the ball between two opposing players. The ball should 
be dropped from below hip height of players in the vicinity. One player from each team
may take part in the face-off with all other players' unicycles and sticks at a distance of 
at least 2 m from the ball. Play starts when the ball touches the ground as signalled by
the referees whistle. A face-off during the game is executed where the ball was when the 
game was interrupted. Exception: Within the goal area, the face-off is executed at the 
closest corner mark.

NEW

14B.9.4 Face-off 
To resume the game without penalizing one of the teams, a face-off can be used. For 
the face-off, the referee drops the ball between two opposing players. The ball should 
be dropped from 50 cm. One player from each team 
may take part in the face-off with all other players' unicycles and sticks at a distance of 
at least 2 m from the ball. Play starts when the ball touches the ground as signalled by
the referees whistle. A face-off during the game is executed where the ball was when the 
game was interrupted. Exception: Within the goal area, the face-off is executed at the 
closest corner mark.

Body

Small change to height.

References

---

Proposal 33: Section 15B.5.X No-charge semi-circle areas

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

The no-charge areas should not and have not been used in unibasketball so far, and this should be explicit in the rules.

Proposal

Before Section 15B.5.8, adding of a new section:

Section 15B.5.X No-charge semi-circle areas

The no-charge semi-circle areas and the related rule are ignored.

Body

Unicycles may be more dangerous/harmful than human bodies.
This rule was on the website of Unicon20 but not in the IUF rulebook (it was too late to include it).

References

---

Proposal 24: Ball in Spokes Rule wording improvement

Committee: 14. Hockey

Vote Summary:

Passed on April 10, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 12 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Ball in Spokes rule is poorly worded.

Proposal

Old

14B.5.8 Ball In Spokes
If the ball gets stuck between the spokes of someone's unicycle, the opposing team gets
a free shot (not a 6.5 m penalty).

 

NEW

14B.5.8 Ball In Spokes

In the event that a ball becomes lodged within a player's wheel, possession will be given to the opposing team as a free shot (For execution see 14B.9.1 Free Shot). 

Body

Improved ball in spokes rule by taking out unnecessary wording

References

---

Proposal 30: Section 15B.5.5; Inclusive pronoun

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

A non-inclusive pronoun left.

Proposal

Change `unless he begins dribbling` into `unless they begin dribbling` in Section 15B.5.5.

Body

For consistency and inclusivity.

References

---

Proposal 27: Section 15B.5.9; Typo

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Typo

Proposal

Section 15B.5.9

Removal of the superfluous `it` in `if it it does not`.

Body

Typo

References

---

Proposal 32: Section 15B.5.3; Small incidental contact by an unmounted player

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 16, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

5 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 5, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Beginners (in particular) may create many small contacts when accidentally dismounting and this should not always stop the game.

Proposal

Section 15B.5.3

Change

Referees may allow incidental contact between the ball and an unmounted player or unicycle if such contact does not disrupt the flow of the game.

into

Referees may allow incidental contact between the ball (or another player, with or without the ball) and an unmounted player or unicycle if such contact does not disrupt the flow of the game.

Body

It may happen that a player looses balance, gets unmounted, and touches a mounted player. If such a small contact does not disrupt the game, referees should be able to allow it.

References

---

Proposal 37: Section 15B.1; clothing and protections

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 02, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

7 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 6, Disagree: 1, Abstain: 0.

Background

The text about clothing and protections was unclear. Also, there are often discussions/issues about the particular case of the helmet.

Proposal

Section 15B.1 

Change

Clothing suggestions for comfort and safety:
* Short shoelaces, or laces tucked in
* Definitely no jewelry (watches, necklaces, earrings)
* No hard clothing or protection, especially above the knees.

into

Clothing and equipment must respect the dedicated section of the FIBA rules (section 4.4.2) and the following items:
* No jewelry (watches, necklaces, earrings, etc.), or they must be protected.
* No hard clothing or protection above the knees except for round helmets (no protruding parts).
* Soft protections, including headgears, are permitted.

Body

Initial text was mentioning « suggestions » while items were written as requirements.
In fact, Section 4.4.2 of the FIBA rules correspond quite well to what we want.
We had the explicit issue about helmets with Konstantin Antonov. After discussion with his father, soft helmets (headgears) seem to be a good solution and are officially permitted by the FIBA rules. After discussion, the subcommittee decided to allow hard round helmets as well.

References

---

Proposal 38: Section 15B.5.6; Clarification about pivot

Committee: 15. Basketball

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 02, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

7 out of 9 voting members have voted.

Agree: 7, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

The section about pivot needs clarification.

Proposal

Change from

15B.5.6 Idling, Twisting and Hopping

Idling is equivalent to the pivot foot and therefore is allowed. Twisting, where the pedals stay at the same height, the tire stays in contact with the oor, and the rider moves the unicycle left and right is also considered a pivot foot, and therefore allowed. The player must also stay within a half-meter radius from the point where the idling or twisting started. A player may not hop (jump up and down repeatedly with the unicycle) while holding the ball. Hopping while dribbling is permitted.

into

15B.5.6 Idling, Twisting and Hopping While Holding the Ball

Idling is equivalent to the pivot foot and therefore is allowed. Twisting, where the wheel is not rolling, the tire stays in contact with the floor, and the rider turns the unicycle left and right is also considered a pivot, and therefore allowed. The player may alternate between stand still, twisting and idling, with the restriction that only a single continuous period of idling is allowed. The player must also stay within a half-meter radius from the point where the idling started. A player may not hop (jump with the unicycle) while holding the ball, unless the ball is released from the hand(s) before the tire touches back the floor. Hopping while dribbling is permitted.

Body

An overall clarification of the section, especially concerning idling and hopping.

References

---

Proposal 39: 3B.3.2.5 Drafting

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on June 05, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

The discussion began with mixed events with unicyclist and non-unicyclist participants. Drafting is not defined in the rules. Rather than discussing the interactions between unicyclists and non-unicyclists, it seemed more appropriate to define drafting and regulate it.

Proposal

Old rule :

New rule :

3B.3.2.5 Drafting

1. Drafting is riding close behind another rider or vehicle to reduce air resistance and benefit from the slipstream. It is considered drafting when the distance is less than 5 meters front/back or 1.5 meters laterally.
2. In all road races drafting behind non-unicyclist participants, non-participants and vehicles is prohibited at all times. Additinally in all
2.1 non-drafting races, drafting behind other unicyclist participants is forbidden at any time.
2.2 drafting races, drafting between unicyclist participants in the same race is permitted unless otherwise specified in the event rules.
3. Race officials may evaluate drafting infractions based on rider behavior, timing, and positioning.

Body

 It appears necessary to define what drafting is and to define rules that will be used for road races : time trials and other road races.

References

---

Proposal 10: Revise 3B.5.2 Starting and 3B.5.3 False Starts

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 20, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Since the rules for starts and false starts in track races and road races are very similar, this proposal has the intention to harmoniz the rules.

Proposal

Old Rule:

3B.5.2 Starting

Riders may start mounted, holding onto a starting post or other support, or onto each other. Riders may mount after the start signal, if they wish.
Usually, a start-beep apparatus is used. This provides a six-count start: beep - beep -beep - beep - beep - buup! The timing between (the start of) successive beeps is one second. The first ve beeps have all the same sound frequency. The final tone (buup) has a higher frequency, so that the competitors can easily distinguish this tone from the rest. The proper moment to start is the beginning of the final tone.
As an alternative, the Starter will give a three-count start before firing a starting gun on the fourth count. Example: One, two, three, BANG! The time between each of these elements should be the same, and approximately 3/4 seconds. This allows riders to predict the timing of the gun, for a fair start.
Riders start with the fronts of their tires (forward most part of wheel) behind the edge of the starting line that is farthest from the finish line. Rolling starts are not permitte in any race. Riders may start from behind the starting line if they wish, provided all other starting rules are followed. Riders may lean before the start, but their wheels may not move forward during the start beeps or counting down. Rolling back is allowed.

3B.5.3 False Starts

A false start occurs if a rider's wheel moves forward before the start signal, or if one or more riders are forced to dismount due to interference from another rider or other source. In any case, only the earliest false starter will be assigned a false start, with the associated penalty (warning, time penalty or disqualification).
There are three options on how to deal with false starts:
One False Start Allowed Per Rider:
In case of a false start, the heat is restarted. Any rider(s) who caused their personal first false start may start again. Any rider(s) causing their personal second false start are disqualified.
One False Start Allowed Per Heat:
In case of a false start, the heat is restarted. For the first false start of a particular heat, all riders may start again. Thereafter, any rider(s) causing a false start are disqualified.
Time Penalty:
In case of a false start, the heat is not restarted. If a false start occurs by one or multiple riders, these riders receive a time penalty (such as 10 seconds).
If a heat has to be restarted, the Starter will immediately recall the riders, for example by firing a gun or blowing a whistle or any other clear and pre-defined signal.
If the race is started using individual starts or heat starts (see sections 3D.10.1 and 3D.10.2) a time penalty is the recommended option. In the case of a mass start (section 3D.10.3), any option is viable.

 

New Rule:

3B.5.2 The Start

1. Riders start with the fronts of their tires (forward most part of wheel) behind the edge of the starting line that is farthest from the finish line. 
1.1 With an individual start, the rider may start mounted, holding onto a starting post or other support. The rider may place the starting post or other support in the location most comfortable for them. The rider may mount after the start signal, if they wish. The rider has to start directly behind the Start line.
1.2 With an heat or mass start, riders may start mounted, holding onto a starting post or other support, or onto each other. Riders may mount after the start signal, if they wish.
2. Rolling starts are not permitted in any race. Riders may lean before the start, but their wheels may not move forward during the start beeps or counting down. Rolling back should be avoided.
3. All commands of the starter are to be given in English at Unicon or international competitions. At other competitions, English is optional.
4. For heat or mass starts, the starter must announce the last remaining minute before the start. About 10 seconds before the start, the starter should give the command “Ready”. After the command “Ready”, all riders must move to their starting position. As soon as the Starter is satisfied that all riders are steady in the correct starting position, he gives the command “Attention” and starts the race. This can be done by a start sequence as follows:
4.1 Usually, a start-beep apparatus is used. This provides a six-count start: “beep - beep -beep - beep - beep - buup!” The timing between (the start of) successive beeps is one second. The first five beeps have all the same sound frequency. The final tone (buup) has a higher frequency, so that the competitors can easily distinguish this tone from the rest. The proper moment to start is the beginning of the final tone.
Note: Commonly used electronic starting devices use frequencies of about 650 Hz for the first five tones and about 795 Hz for the sixth tone.
4.2 As an alternative, the Starter will give a three-count start before firing a starting gun on the fourth count. Example: “One, two, three, BANG!” The time between (the start of) each of these elements must be the same, and should approximately 1 second.
Both variants allow the rider to start leaning ahead of the “buup/BANG”, for an exact and predictable start. It is recommended to use one or the other of those two options for all races in a competition if possible. The option to be used must be announced in advance of the competition.
5. If the Starter is not satisfied that all is ready for the start to proceed after he gave the command “Ready” and the riders are on their starting position or they otherwise abort the start, the command should be “Go Back”. If a start-beep apparatus is used and the start sequence is already started the start should be aborted by blowing a whistle or other clear and predefined signal. Where a rider in the judgement of the Starter, after the command “Ready”,
5.1 causes the start to be aborted, for instance by dismounting, without a valid reason (such reason to be evaluated by the Starter); or
5.2 does not place themselves in their final starting position at once and without delay; or
5.3 disturbs other riders in the race through sound, movement or otherwise,
the Starter must abort the start. The Starter may warn the rider for improper conduct (disqualify in case of repeated infringement of the Rule). However, when an extraneous reason was considered to be the cause for aborting the start, or the Referee does not agree with the Starters decision, no rider gets warned or disqualified. This decision must be clearly indicated to the riders.

3B.5.3 False Starts

1. A false start occurs if a rider's wheel moves forward before the start signal.
2. If a heat has to be restarted, the Starter will immediately recall the riders, for example by blowing a whistle or other clear and predefined signal. Any warning or disqualification resulting from this must be clearly indicated to the riders in question.
3. There are three options on how to deal with false starts:
3.1 One False Start Allowed Per Heat: The use of this option is strongly discouraged when no electronic false start monitoring system is used. In case of a false start, the heat is restarted. After the first false start of a particular heat, all riders receive a warning and may start again. Thereafter, any rider(s) causing a false start are disqualified for this event. Only the earliest false starting rider gets assigned this false start and the associated disqualification.
3.2 One False Start Allowed Per Rider: In case of a false start, the heat is restarted. After the first false start of a particular rider in a heat, the rider in question receives a warning and may start again. Any rider(s) causing their personal second false start are disqualified for this event. Only the earliest false starting rider gets assigned this false start and the associated warning or disqualification.
3.3 Time Penalty: In case of a false start, the heat is not restarted. If a false start occurs by one or multiple riders, these riders receive a time penalty (such as 10 seconds).
It is recommended to use one or the other of those three options for all races in a competition if possible. The option to be used must be announced in advance of the competition.

Body

Further information can be found in the corresponding discussion.

References

Already in the Rulebook Committee before the last one, a discussion was started in the Track Committee based on the first sentence of the false start rule:
"A false start occurs if a rider's wheel moves forward before the start signal, or if one or more riders are forced to dismount due to interference from another rider or other source." which is not entirely clear in several aspects:
1. What is meant by "interference from another rider or other source"? And to whom exactly is the false start attributed and who is warned?
2. Should it be better to distinguish between an aborted start and a false start in order to separate the causes and consequences more clearly?

Based on this, the rules for the start and false start have been revised - the result of the update of the track rules can be found here: As PDF Version with changes highlighted
The related discussion can be found here: https://iuf-rulebook-2022.committees.unicycling-software.com/discussions/20

It was figured out that it makes sense to distinguish between a false start and another reason for the start being aborted and to give the starter at the same time the possibility to warn riders or to disqualify in case of repeated infringements, if they can be made responsible for a start being aborted according to his opinion.
At the same time the starter should have the possibility to abort the start without consequences for one of the riders, e.g. because the abort is caused by external influences.

---

Proposal 28: 3D.10.2 Heat Start

Committee: 3. Road Racing

Vote Summary:

Passed on May 20, 2025

Votes on this proposal:

9 out of 14 voting members have voted.

Agree: 9, Disagree: 0, Abstain: 0.

Background

Proposal

Old rule:

3D.10.2 Heat Start

Heats should consist of at least 12 riders, either male or female (no mixed heats). Heats may vary in size. Heats are sorted by speed with the fastest heat going first. The first heat should be devoted to the fastest males. The second heat should be devoted to the fastest females. The top males and the top females must have equivalent racing conditions. The following heats should be sorted by speed. The time intervals between heats should run as follows:
• For non-lapped races, there should be a time interval of at least 5 minutes (for the 10k) or 10 minutes (for the Marathon) between heats 1 and 2, as well as between heats 2 and 3. This is to ensure safe and fair racing for the top male and top female heats.
• For lapped races (and races other than the 10k and Marathon), the time intervals between heats 1, 2, and 3 should be set up such that following heats have the least chance of interfering with the top male and female riders.

 

New rule:

3D.10.2 Wave Start

1. A wave start is a start where a smaller group of competitors start the race together. This type of start is commonly used in fixed distance races (e.g. 10km or Marathon) when a mass start is not feasible due to space limitations.

2. The various classes may share the race course, but Standard racers should always start separately from Unlimited racers.

3. Waves should consist of at least 12 riders. Waves may vary in size. Waves are sorted by speed with the fastest wave going first. The first wave should be devoted to the fastest males, and the second wave to the fastest females. These waves must be single-gender. The top males and the top females must have equivalent racing conditions. The following waves should be sorted by speed. The time intervals between waves 1, 2, and 3 should be set up such that following waves have the least chance of interfering with the top male and female riders. In all cases, the minimum time interval between two waves is 1 minute.

Body

The "heat start" subsection seems to concern wave starts. I therefore propose to systematically replace "heat" with "wave" in this subsection. And to modify a sentence, because it does not seem necessary to me to add a distinction between races with laps and those without laps.

References