Missing in the Rules: When Is a Goal Considered Scored?

This discussion has an associated proposal. View Proposal Details here.

Comments about this discussion:

Started

I've noticed that the rules do not define what it actually means to have scored a goal. I believe we should specify that the entire ball must have crossed the goal line. At this point, it might also be useful to address how to handle situations where the goal has been displaced, as i don't think that has been adressed yet.

I would suggest:
14.B.7.1. General: 

A goal is considered scored when the entire ball has completely crossed the goal line between the goalposts and beneath the crossbar, provided that no rule violation has occurred by the attacking team.

 

And 14.B.7.2. Displaced Goal

If the goal cage is displaced, a goal may still be awarded if the ball crosses the area where the goal line would have been, between the original positions of the posts and beneath the imaginary crossbar, and if the displacement was caused by the defending team or occurred unintentionally.

The other entries would need to be newly numbered accordingly.

 

I am not sure about the „if the goal cage is displaced“ wording, in "14.B.8.6. Moving the goal" we state "The players are not allowed to move the goal." so we should probably be consistent in the wording here, but as a non native speaker I'm unsure because of the two different meanings of "goal" which are both used here.

 

(I'll make a new discussion about displaced goal cages in general)

 

What do you think of this?

Comment

I agree that somewhere there should be a definition of when a goal is a goal. I would just replace “completly” with “full diameter” in your suggestion above. And I'm not sure if we need the second part of the sentence “ provided that no rule violation has occurred by the attacking team.” needed. The other sections then describe when a goal does not count (with hand, long-range shot, ...). anyway.

Not sure about the displaced goal session. How would we handle it today? Penalty goal or 6,5m?

Comment

I agree that the rules do not cover this.

For me, something else is also unclear. Usually (at least in Switzerland), the front part of the goal is placed on the front part (towards field center) of the goal line. Does the ball need to completely cross the goal line with e.g. 5 cm width or is it enough if the ball completely crosses the front part of the goal line (so no longer is with any part in the field center but just partly over the goal line and partly behind the goal line)? I think this detail should also be included in a potential addition. Based on other sports, the rule is usually implemented with the ball needing to completely cross the entire width of the goal line.

In floorball, the most similar rule is:

When the entire ball passes the goal line from the front, having been played in a correct way with a field player’s stick, and no offence leading to a free-hit or a penalty has been committed by the attacking team in connection with, or immediately before, the goal.
This includes:
When the goal cage is out of position and the ball passes the goal line from the front between the marks for the posts and below the imaginary position of the bar.

Comment

In German league I have seen diverend typs of goals in the gyms, the post varios something between 2 to 10 cm. Therefore the goal line (marked or not) will vary as well with the goal posts.

I judge a goal scored when the entire ball has completely crossed the goal line or all parts of the ball are behind the rear end of the goal line. If the goal has been displaced slightly (by foul or no foul) I would use the imagine goal line. If the goal has been displaced more than slighly I stop the game by blowing the whistle and I stop the time. When the game has stopped no goal is allowed to score and the referres have time to sort out who was responsible for the displaced goal and happens this intentional or not. 

If not intentional displaced or both referres can not decide who displaced it, I would give a face-off at a corner.

If a attacking player intentional displaced the goal > Intentional foul > 2-min punishment > game restarts with goalies-ball.

If a defending player intentional displaced the goal > Intentional foul > 2-min punishment > 14B.9.3 Penalty Goal:  Penalty Goal, in doubt only 6.5m

And if I am not quick enough to blow the whistle the game is ongoing (advantage given) the ball crosses the imagine goal line of the displaced goal I score goal. But by"Additionally, at the referee’s discretion, offending players may be sent off after advantage has been played."

A sentence direct after "14B.7 Goal Shots" and before "14B.7.1 Goal Shot With Arms Or Hands" as suggested before "A goal is considered scored when the entire ball has completely crossed the goal line between the goalposts and beneath the crossbar." will here be enough for clarification. 

#Good referring is a hard job.#

 

 

Comment

I agree with all the above about giving a goal even if goals have been displaced. I think we should provide something that states that a goal only counts if no infringement has occured as I have had people give a goal despite high sticks saying that the goal went in before the stick was high.

Can we include in the rulebook a specification for how the goal line should be stuck down, and define the goal as being scored when the ball has fully crossed the front edge of that line?

We should standardise that the front edge of the goal line (the edge closest to the centremark) must be in line with the front face of the goalposts. Then, a goal would be awarded only when the entire ball has completely passed this front edge.

This would ensure consistency regardless of tape width.  Otherwise the distance the ball needs to travel to be considered a goal would vary depending on whether someone uses 2 cm or 8 cm wide tape for the goal line. Either that or we need to state tape width.

Comment

So, taking together, we could add as a new rule:

14B.7.1 Correctly scored goal

A goal is considered scored when the entire ball passes the front edge of the goal line from the front, having been played in a correct way, and no offence has been committed by the attacking team in connection with, or immediately before, the goal.
This includes when the goal cage is out of position, and if the displacement was caused by the defending team or occurred unintentionally, and the ball passes the front edge of the goal line from the front between the marks for the posts and below the imaginary position of the bar.

And adding that the front edge of the goal line (the edge closest to the centremark) must be in line with the front face of the goalposts (from Steven). I couldn't find anything related to the goal line in the passed proposal. Is this still open somewhere, I thought this was agreed on??

Comment

I like the suggestion from nicolai and i think it covers all important things. But i think we need a new number 14B.7.4 because 14B.7.1 is given to Goal Shot With Arms Or Hands

Comment

Thanks Steven for creating this proposal and also including marking the goal line!

A goal is considered scored when the entire ball crosses the front edge of the goal line from the front, provided it entered from the front of the goals ...

I think there is a unnecessary repetition. Either "... ball crosses the front edge of the goal line from the front, provided it was played ..." or "crosses the front edge of the goal line, provided it entered from the front of the goals and was played legally with".

And if we take the latter, I would remove the "s" of goals (as marked above), but this may also just be my non-native impression.

Comment

Goal posts are depending on manufacturer between 3.5 and 8.0 cm. The diameter of a tennis ball produced to acordance the ITF between 6.54 und 6.86 cm.

If a ball crosses only the front edge of the goal line from the front the ball and sit on the goal line or travelling along the goal line the proposed new rule gives a goal. Normally nobody will give a goal in this situation because not the full diameter of the ball has ever crossed the goal line.

I have found a generic rule in German, here translated by KI: "A goal is scored when the ball has completely crossed the goal line, which is located between the goalposts and below the crossbar. Importantly, the ball must have completely crossed the line before it is considered a goal."

Therefore I suggest not using "the front edge of the goal line from the front" better would be "rear edge of the goal line from the rear" or the text KI has translated.

Comment

I think there are a few misunderstandings.

The ball has to completely cross the front edge of the goal line. So if it only touches the goal line, no goal shall be given. Steven suggested to take the front edge, as goal line width may be very different (depending on tape) and the front edge is always the same.

And the "from the front" refers to the travelling direction of the ball (as far as I understand). If for some reason, the ball crosses the goal line from behind (e.g. when the goal (cage) is misplaced, no goal will be awarded.

Comment

I got your point. I had a misunderstanding with "from the rear". Certainly a ball coming from the backside of the goal crossing the goal line can't be given for a goal. 

"A goal is scored when the ball has completely crossed the goal line from front, which is located between the goalposts and below the crossbar. Importantly, the ball must have completely crossed the line before it is considered a goal." Yes, a "goal line width may be very different (depending on tape)" Important is that the ball has to completely cross the rear end of the goal line. 


Copyright ©

IUF 2025